Archive

Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

Public spending gave Japan its "Lost Decade" and largest public debt in the developed world; Geithner wants to do it bigger

February 9th, 2009 No comments

What did Japan get from sustained and massive public works spending by the LDP after a real estate bubble burst in the late 1980s?  According to a recent article in the IHT, one thing is clear:  taxpayers ended up being saddled with the largest public debt in the developed world, totaling 180 percent of its $5.5 trillion economy.

While there are disputes over how to view the results, the Japanese appear to have learned a lesson, while US officials like Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, who spent time as a financial attaché in Japan after the collapse, appear to determined to repeat it on a larger scale

Excerpts from the article:

Economists tend to divide into two camps on the question of Japan’s infrastructure spending: those, many of them Americans like Geithner, who think it did not go far enough; and those, many of them Japanese, who think it was a colossal waste.

Among ordinary Japanese, the spending is widely disparaged for having turned the nation into a public-works-based welfare state and making regional economies dependent on Tokyo for jobs. Much of the blame has fallen on the Liberal Democratic Party, which has long used government spending to grease rural vote-buying machines that help keep the party in power. …

Beyond that, proponents of Keynesian-style stimulus spending in the United States say that the Japanese approach failed to accomplish more not because of waste but because it was never undertaken wholeheartedly. They argue that instead of making one big push to pump up the economy with economic shock therapy, Japan spread its spending out over several years, diluting the effects.

After years of heavy spending in the first half of the 1990s, economists say, Japanese leaders grew concerned about growing budget deficits and cut back too soon, snuffing out the recovery in its infancy, much as Roosevelt did to the U.S. economy in 1936. Growth that, by 1996, had reached 3 percent was suffocated by premature spending cuts and tax increases, they say. While spending remained high in the late 1990s, Japan never gave the economy another full-fledged push, these economists say.

They also say that the size of Japan’s apparently successful stimulus in the early 1990s suggests that the United States will need to spend far more than the current $820 billion to get results. Between 1991 and 1995, Japan spent some $2.1 trillion on public works, in an economy roughly half as large as that of the United States, according to the Cabinet Office. “Stimulus worked in Japan when it was tried,” said David Weinstein, a professor of Japanese economics at Columbia University. “Japan’s lesson is that, if anything, the current U.S. stimulus will not be enough.”

Categories: Uncategorized Tags:

Foreign Affairs: Burden sharing on climate change

August 23rd, 2008 No comments

From Foreign Affairs,
September/October 2008

Categories: Uncategorized Tags:

Open letter response to Gore’s "Alliance for Climate Protection" proposed 10-year transition to "clean" power

August 6th, 2008 No comments

I received the following email today from Cathy Zoi, who is the CEO of Al Gore’s “Alliance for Climate Protection” and sent back the response I note further below;

Dear Tokyo,

Last week, Exxon Mobil announced record profits — at the same time that the rest of us were paying record high prices at the gas pump.

It doesn’t need to be this way. Our energy prices don’t need to be this high.

If we repower America and generate 100% of our electricity from clean sources within ten years, we can bring our energy costs down.

A lot of people are surprised when they find out how quickly we can make this transition. We’ve built a fun quiz to help show the way. How well do you know America’s energy? ou might find the answers surprising.

We can start relying on fuels that are free and abundant right here at home. Fuels like the sun and wind. Once our electricity grid is based on clean sources, we can plug in our cars, use those free energy sources, and stop paying through the nose to the oil companies.

On the day Exxon announced its record profits, I testified before the U.S. Congress. I explained that there are no technical or material impediments to achieving the goal of 100% clean electricity within ten years. The only thing missing is political will. And that’s why the We Campaign exists — to build support for solutions that can revitalize our economy and solve the climate crisis.

The average score of people who’ve taken the quiz is 63% Can you beat that? .

Sincerely,

Cathy Zoi
CEO
www.wecansolveit.org

My response?  As follows:

 

Cathy, I took the quiz and got 100%.  I’ve also blogged on Al Gore’s recent proposal – the important goal of which I fully support – here:
 
 
However, I think that you are making a mistake to not supporting more nuclear power, which has by far the least environmental footprint of our currently available energy options, including solar and wind.  Why aren’t you guys taking the bull by the horns and educating American consumers about nuclear power?  You could really build a cross-party coalition if you did.
 
Furthermore, the focuses on oil company profits, gas pump prices and energy independence are needless distractions.  They not only tacitly support the chief basis for our ruinous War on Terror, but actually add to pressure to produce more environmentally costly coal and to open ANWR and more of the OCS.  Why don’t you, too, stop pandering to uninformed voters and play things more straight?
 
Sincerely,
 
Tom

 

 

 

Categories: Uncategorized Tags:

Krugman

August 1st, 2008 No comments

http://www.env-econ.net/2008/08/krugman-on-weit.html?cid=124964832#comment-124964832

http://www.dianaswednesday.com/2008/08/uncertainty-and-climate-change/

http://www.salon.com/books/review/2007/08/29/cool_it/index1.html

http://www.env-econ.net/2008/07/its-not-over-ti.html

http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/2008/08/01/choosing-what-to-worry-about/

http://www.marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/science/index.html

http://wmbriggs.com/blog/2008/08/01/effectively-destroy-planet-earth-as-we-know-it/

Categories: Uncategorized Tags:

Roger Pielke Jr. blames scientists for getting upset at corporate disinformation/polemics

July 27th, 2008 No comments

 

 

because many of the complainants are scientists, some not even British,
another important perspective on this debate is the role of scientists
and other academics in efforts to limit the freedom of expression.
Arguably, the global scientific community shares a set of norms on the
free exchange of information that, while shaped by each of our national
and cultural settings, also transcends those situational factors.

 

On climate change however, some in the scientific community have
departed quite radically from support for freedom of expression. For
example, recently NASA’s James Hansen
has famously called for trials of those who have provided support for
the dissemination of skeptical perspectives on climate change, singling
out executives in energy companies.

These examples of formal and informal sanctions are all used to try
to limit the freedom of expression on the subject of climate change.

Should scientists and other academics be working for restrictions on
the freedom of expression on climate change, or perhaps sanctions for
those expressing or allowing the expression of certain views? It is troubling to see academics and scientists working hard to
sanction certain people because of what they say, rather than taking on
the arguments on their merits, as frustrating and difficult a task that
might seem to be at times.

So while I don’t really have an informed or relevant position on UK
media regulations or even on the substance of the Swindle program, I do
feel strongly that the current wave of climate blasphemy that seems to
be popular among prominent scientists involved in the climate issue is
one day going to be looked back upon as a low point in this debate.

Categories: Uncategorized Tags:

New Federal report

June 24th, 2008 No comments

 

Changes in extreme weather and climate events have significant impacts and are among the most serious challenges to society in coping with a changing climate. 

Many extremes and their associated impacts are now changing.  For example, in recent decades most of North America has been experiencing more unusually hot days and nights, fewer unusually cold days and nights, and fewer frost days. Heavy downpours have become more frequent and intense. Droughts are becoming more severe in some regions, though there are no clear trends for North America as a whole. The power and frequency of Atlantic hurricanes have increased substantially in recent decades, though North American mainland land-falling hurricanes do not appear to have increased over the past century. Outside the tropics, storm tracks are shifting northward and the strongest storms are becoming even stronger.

It is well established through formal attribution studies that the global warming of the past 50 years is due primarily to
human-induced increases in heat-trapping gases. Such studies have only recently been used to determine the causes of some changes in extremes at the scale of a continent. Certain aspects of observed increases in temperature extremes
have been linked to human influences. The increase in heavy precipitation events is associated with an increase in water
vapor, and the latter has been attributed to human-induced warming. No formal attribution studies for changes in drought severity in North America have been attempted. There is evidence suggesting a human contribution to recent changes in hurricane activity as well as in storms outside the tropics, though a confident assessment will require further study.

In the future, with continued global warming, heat waves and heavy downpours are very likely to further increase in
frequency and intensity. Substantial areas of North America are likely to have more frequent droughts of greater severity.  Hurricane wind speeds, rainfall intensity, and storm surge levels are likely to increase. The strongest cold season storms are likely to become more frequent, with stronger winds and more extreme wave heights.

Weather and climate extremes (Figure ES1)
have always posed serious challenges to society.
Changes in extremes are already having
impacts on socioeconomic and natural systems,
and future changes associated with continued
warming will present additional challenges.
Increased frequency of heat waves and drought,
for example, could seriously affect human
health, agricultural production, water availability
and quality, and other environmental condi-
tions (and the services they provide) (Chapter
1, section 1.1).

Human-induced warming is known to affect
climate variables such as temperature and
precipitation. Small changes in the averages
of many variables result in larger changes in
their extremes. Thus, within a changing climate
system, some of what are now considered to
be extreme events will occur more frequently,
while others will occur less frequently (e.g.,
more heat waves and fewer cold snaps [FiguresES.1, ES.3, ES.4]). Rates of change matter since
these can affect, and in some cases overwhelm,
existing societal and environmental capacity.
More frequent extreme events occurring over
a shorter period reduce the time available for
recovery and adaptation. In addition, extreme
events often occur in clusters. The cumulative
effect of compound or back-to-back extremes
can have far larger impacts than the same events
spread out over a longer period of time. For
example, heat waves, droughts, air stagnation,
and resulting wildfires often occur concurrently
and have more severe impacts than any of these
alone (Chapter 1, section 1.2).

Climate models indicate that currently rare extreme
events will become more commonplace.
For example, for a mid-range scenario of future
greenhouse gas emissions, a day so hot that it is
currently experienced only once every 20 years
would occur every three years by the middle of
the century over much of the continental U.S.
and every five years over most of Canada. By
the end of the century, it would occur every
other year or more (Chapter 3, section 3.3.1).

Extreme precipitation episodes (heavy downpours)
have become more frequent and more
intense in recent decades over most of North
America and now account for a larger percentage
of total precipitation. For example,
intense precipitation (the heaviest 1% of daily
precipitation totals) in the continental U.S.
increased by 20% over the past century while
total precipitation increased by 7% (Chapter 2,
section 2.2.2.2).

Heavy precipitation events averaged over North
America have increased over the past 50 years,
consistent with the observed increases in atmospheric
water vapor, which have been associated with human-induced increases in greenhouse
gases (Chapter 3, section 3.2.3).
Projected Changes
On average, precipitation is likely to be less frequent
but more intense (Figure ES.4), and precipitation
extremes are very likely to increase
(see Table ES.1; Figure ES.5).

 

http://downloads.climatescience.gov/sap/sap3-3/sap3-3-final-ExecutiveSummary.pdf

Weather and Climate Extremes in a Changing Climate

 

http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2008/20080619_climatereport.html

http://downloads.climatescience.gov/sap/sap3-3/Brochure-CCSP-3-3.pdf

 

Categories: Uncategorized Tags:

Is Atmospheric CO2 is Already Beyond Safe Limit?

January 22nd, 2008 No comments

 

Categories: Uncategorized Tags:

The History of Climate "Alarmism"

January 22nd, 2008 No comments
Categories: Uncategorized Tags: